Tony L.
Google
Our trip to the Falklands was unfortunately shortened by one day. While this might seem like a minor adjustment to some, for many of us, the journey to Antarctica and the Falklands represents a once-in-a-lifetime experience, especially considering the significant cost of AUD1000 per person per day. When the captain announced the early return of the ship due to an anticipated strong wind condition two days in the future, it sparked a wave of concerns and questions among the passengers.
It’s important to note that the captain may not have realised that all passengers had internet access on board. After the decision to return was made, we promptly checked the weather conditions and found no indication of strong winds in the forecast. Additionally, having already crossed the Drake Passage, we were left feeling confused about the rationale behind the captain's choice.
The weather during our return journey to Ushuaia was absolutely perfect. The next day, as we disembarked, we were greeted by clear skies and no indication of impending bad weather. Later in the evening the following day, rain and wind arrived, but it felt like just another typical rainy day in Ushuaia. Clearly, the conditions were not severe enough to prevent Hurtigruten from departing once again with the next group of passengers.
The objective seems to be returning the ship on time for the next group of passengers, and it has nothing to do with our safety. With a new vessel like the Roald Amundsen, if it cannot manage moderate wind conditions, it should not be operating in Antarctica and the Falklands.
Additionally, during the initial briefing, the expedition crew promised their passengers two activities each day in Antarctica. While two activities were conducted on the first day, for the remainder of our time in the Antarctic Peninsula, we were limited to only one activity per day.
This raises the question: why?
As we sailed from one location to another, the captain appeared to navigate at a deliberately slow pace without justification. Upon reaching the next destination, which was often not far away from each other, we found ourselves with insufficient time to engage in more than one activity before the day concluded. For example: The journey from Stanley to Westpoint Cove, Falkland Islands, travelling east to west along the northern route of the islands, consumed the entire day. This lengthy travel time implies that strategic decisions were likely made well in advance of our arrival at Westpoint Cove. It was here that the captain chose to return the ship during that night’s briefing.
The financial implications are substantial, especially given the funds gathered from 400 passengers. With an average collection exceeding AUD1,000 per person per day, this amounts to at least half a million dollars. This is a considerable sum that has been taken from the passengers who have not received ONE full day on the itinerary and at least 4 other activities while in Antarctica. Such a situation casts a negative light on Hurtigruten, and we want to ensure that the travellers are fully aware of what they will receive from Hurtigruten as apposed to what has been advertised.