Alex L.
Google
Christophe Grosjean: €3,000 Withheld, Zero Accountability
Mr. Christoph Grosjean, your reply reads less like the words of a professional in “luxury hospitality” and more like an emotional outburst aimed at discrediting a guest rather than addressing the facts.
Let’s deal with the facts which you have avoided entirely:
1. The €3,000 Dispute
On the second day of our stay, the sliding door could no longer be closed. You could have proposed hiring an independent, neutral inspector to assess the issue, but instead you claimed that in summer it was impossible to even find someone to fix the door and now you state it will take you “one month” to evaluate the so-called damage. Withholding €3,000 without impartial verification is not luxury service, it is opportunism. You are still holding this money.
2. Misrepresentation of Safety
Before booking, you assured us the villa was in one of Biarritz’s safest and most prestigious neighborhoods. Later, you told us it was in a “dangerous area with frequent break-ins.” That is not just a contradiction it’s a deliberate misrepresentation.
3. Unprofessional and Irregular Demands
Luxury operators do not request €2,000 in cash under the table or spring an undisclosed €3,000 deposit upon arrival. These practices are not only unprofessional, they are deeply questionable.
4. Condition of the Property
Mold in the cellar, insect infestations, floors so dirty we could not even walk barefoot, and cleanliness issues severe enough to trigger allergic reactions among guests are not compatible with the word “luxury.” They are a breach of the most basic hospitality standards.
Your attempt to shift the conversation to irrelevant, unverified accusations is transparent damage control.