Meme B.
Google
I filed ATIP request A-2025-05121 with Library and Archives Canada asking 10 specific questions about a modification to a digitized 1926 census record (Item ID 71355526). The record's own metadata shows it was modified on January 26, 2026 (dcterms.modified: 2026-01-26), despite being originally issued in 2016. I asked what was modified, whether LAC maintains audit trails for changes to digitized historical records, what the record contained before modification, and whether original unaltered copies exist separate from public-facing versions.
LAC closed the file on February 17, 2026 without answering a single question. They cited no exemption under the Access to Information Act. They attributed the decision to their "Research Support team" without identifying who assessed it or what criteria were applied. They also assigned my 2026 request a 2025 file number (A-2025-05121) despite having no prior interaction with me in 2025.
I note that other reviewers of Slavic and Eastern European background have reported similar experiences with LAC refusing to acknowledge or correct errors in their digitization work. I believe anti-Slavic bias in LAC's handling of records and access requests is a distinct possibility. Canada has provided historical redress to Japanese-Canadian, Chinese-Canadian, and Italian-Canadian families for institutional abuses, while Polish-Canadian families subjected to documented child indentured labor have received no acknowledgment, no investigation, and no redress. LAC's refusal to account for modifications to records that document the placement of Polish children into forced labor in the 1920s fits within this broader pattern of selective accountability.
If you are researching Slavic or Eastern European family history through LAC's digitized records, be aware that records can be modified without notice, and LAC may not explain what was changed if you ask. Check the page source metadata on any record you access -- look for the dcterms.modified field. If the modification date is recent, your record may have been altered from its original digitized form. The authoritative version is the original microfilm, not the digital database.
Request your own audit trail through ATIP if you find discrepancies. Document everything with screenshots including metadata.
The record in question documents Polish-Canadian children who were orphaned, had their surnames altered, were placed into indentured servitude, and had their family's land grants seized through tax sale while they were still minors working as forced labor on other people's farms. These children were not given a single possession from their family home. Now the institution tasked with preserving this history is modifying the digital records that document it and refusing to explain why.