Laura R.
Yelp
After checking out Stonehenge in the morning, we decided to check out Old Sarum due to favorable reviews that mentioned a lack of people and beautiful grounds. I ended up having a great time! I'm sure part of that was due to this being my first ruins while on the trip, and I was just super excited about that. The grounds are beautiful, sweeping greenery with the castle's ancient stone walls peeking out.
You can see the ruins of some interesting things here, my "favorite" being the royal privy. Built off of the king's private suite around the thirteenth century, there were deep wells dug into the ground that were filled with straw and bark-clippings. There went perhaps... 15 or so feet down. How were these cleaned? Well I'm glad you asked! A poor sap, likely someone who lost a bet (this is me pontificating and there is no historical precedence of this), would be lowered down there into the pit to clean the feces.
Originating around 400 BC when it was believed to have been an Iron Age hillfort, it was occupied by the Romans around AD 43, when it became known as Sorviodunum. It's believed that in its earlier stages, it was a Roman military fort with a civilian settlement nearby. A lot of history of the this place is unknown, and there are swatches of questionable occupation in-between brief periods of suspected use. An Anglo-Saxon settlement was purported to have been founded outside the ramparts around 1003, so life was still happening there before the Conquest. William the Conqueror (and you will see this man's name pop up everywhere) left the greatest mark on Old Sarum. An inner set of fornications, with a huge bailey wrapped around the inner core. Earlier buildings were made of timber, and the earlier surviving structure was the keep, due to its stone construction (from 1100-35). Anyways, the castle and grounds went through several bouts of upkeep and rebuilding, and of course tearing down, replacing, etc.
THE VERDICT:
These ruins were one of my favorite sights the entire time I was in GB, actually. There was just something about them... The history, being surrounded by a once great castle that has sense fallen into ruins, yet it somehow remains almost startlingly beautiful, and also the lack of people. I got some amazing shots here, of the crumbling walls and the green hillside, without a single person in them. I'm not arrogant enough to assume that writing a review will bring more people there, but if I thought it would matter in the grand scheme, I wouldn't even mention it.
You have this amazing visceral, hands on experience here, with ancient walls you can touch. To me, that made the experience more "magical" than Stonehenge, because I was able to actually imagine a king with his cloak brushing against the wall, or a busy kitchen filled with cooks helping to prepare a meal for someone. Since it originated around the time of Roman occupation, you can really feel the hundreds of feet that have walked there.
MY TIME:
I spent a little over an hour and a half here, which was honestly longer than I stayed at Stonehenge. There were no lines, limited people, and free parking available, so you can count out egregious wait times if you're planning a day of visiting a few sights.
TIPS/SUGGESTIONS:
-Since you're walking in grass and mud, it can very wet! I suggest some water-resistent/proof shoes when walking around.
-Buy the booklet! It's only like 3.50 quid, and has a lot of interesting information.