Brian U.
Yelp
The $15 tasting fee included five wines plus a bonus pour. Buying bottles does not waive the tasting fee. Customers were barely buying bottles to take home in Temecula. Across a four-winery tour, we saw one bottle purchased here and one bottle bought at one other winery. For whatever reason, Temecula draws drinkers, but not buyers. If they aren't coming to buy, then a "wine country experience" must be a goal. Unfortunately, the tasting rooms overlook tiny compact vineyards interspersed with large homes and power lines. I'm not saying this to simply "hate on" Temecula, but I want people searching for their first wine country experience to realize that there are prettier and more bucolic locations in other California wine regions.
Palumbo has the industry-abnormal policy of pre-paying for the tasting. I doubt this started on a whim but because customers were walking out without paying. Shame on customers that drink and flee the tab. Not only it is classless, but it's illegal. You're stealing which makes you a thief.
The $52 cabernet sauvignon was the best of the tasting, but still average. The rest needed work - particularly the red blends like the meritage and the "Cellar Dweller" with syrah, merlot, and cab. The vintners might be doing everything right, but the pollution from the expanded suburbia of Temecula doesn't help the growers. If the smoke from a forest fire can alter the 2008 crop in Anderson Valley, then couldn't other forms of pollution negatively impact (albeit on a lesser scale) the wine? If wine absorbs their surroundings through the soil and the air, then Temecula wines will always struggle to find a connoisseur audience and will be relegated to those with disinterested palates like bored daytrippers from San Diego and chugging bachelorettes.
Monte de Oro road south of the winery is an unpaved street. Unwilling to traverse the bumpy road, we saw a Mini Cooper turn back to the paved part of Monte de Oro north of the winery.