jendo44
Google
The Silica Hotel has some genuinely lovely aspects, but overall it didn’t feel worth the extremely high price.||What I loved most was the Silica Lagoon itself. It’s smaller, quieter, and far less crowded than the Blue Lagoon, which made it feel much more relaxing. The silica mask was a nice touch, the breakfast buffet was excellent, and the room was very clean and comfortable.||That said, the value just isn’t there. The rooms are very basic—perfectly fine and comfortable, but comparable to standard hotel rooms you’d expect at a much lower price point. They don’t match the luxury-level cost of staying here.||A major downside is the lack of dining options at the Silica Hotel. Unless you have a car and decide to drive elsewhere, your dinner options are at the Blue Lagoon restaurants - for our one night we ate at Lava: expensive, fancy, and honestly not that great for the price.||I suspect much of the cost is justified by Blue Lagoon admission being included. As a first-time visitor to Iceland, I thought the Blue Lagoon was a must-do—and while the lagoon itself was beautiful, the overall experience wasn’t particularly enjoyable for me (I’ve reviewed that separately). Now that I know better, I’d recommend staying at a nearby hotel and just visiting the Blue Lagoon, which would save a significant amount of money. Or skip the Blue Lagoon altogether, in which case Silica is an unnecessary expense.||It’s also worth noting that the Silica Hotel is not just steps away from the Blue Lagoon—it’s about a 10-minute walk. I didn’t mind the walk, but it does take away from the sense that you’re paying a premium for immediate access.||If there were an option to stay at the Silica without Blue Lagoon admission included, at a lower price point, I think it could be a truly relaxing and enjoyable stay focused on their own lagoon. As it stands, it’s nice—but not nearly nice enough to justify the cost.