Chris Chan
Google
Overpriced mid-quality hospital with uninformed upfront charges, which ignore patient's choices.
SUMC provides an example of what is wrong with the healthcare system in the Philippines. Overpriced middling quality hospital, which gouges it's patients, it is not upfront about informing patients of costs, doctors tied to branded medicine and monopolistic behaviour of the on-site pharmacy. Sadly not unusual in the Philippines, and why medical costs are the source of so many dramas.
My experience.... being charged monopolistically priced medicines from the onsite pharmacy (e.g. P311 for Disudrin, when I bought it off site for P129, later that cost changed to P200), being charged for a private room (P3000), when we signed up for a ward (P1600-P2000), doctors fixated on a particular brand of medicine when the key ingredient is the same, and even the in-house pharmacy is overpriced (presumably unable on pass on the benefits of collective bargaining on wholesale prices or just straightforward profiteering. E.g Keptrix P1330 vs P1026 from outside).
I've had experience of Public and private hospitals in US, Europe, South Korea and Singapore. So I can recognise a lack of efficiency and productivity in SUMC. There is the ACE hospital just 2 minutes away if you want a similar private hospital experience in place with less ants in the room and more parking (albeit muddy), and NOPH just 2 minutes away for a government hospital treatment. I don't see the point of having this hospital that doesn't add anything to the community.
Why did I choose this? I didn't really... Doctors in the hospital are self-serving to only promote the hospitals in which they are resident and ignore the patient's economic situation. Should have been advised on a range of hospitals. E.g. NOPH, which was nearer, just as suitable in providing healthcare for common ailments, but far, far cheaper. Even a hospital in rural Negros Oriental would have been suitable, but 80%-90% cheaper.