Gopi D.
Google
Our recent stay at The Park Hotels, MG Road, Bangalore was a study in contrasts—beginning with several commendable aspects but ending with considerable disappointment.
To start with the positives, we must acknowledge the efficiency with which we were received. We were promptly picked up from the airport, a gesture that immediately conveyed professionalism. The hotel premises are clean, aesthetically pleasing, and well-maintained, creating an inviting ambience. The staff members were consistently warm, welcoming, and attentive, offering courteous service throughout our stay. We were particularly impressed with the breakfast spread, which was both extensive and delectable—undeniably one of the highlights of our visit.
However, these strengths were overshadowed by a series of significant shortcomings.
We had booked the hotel directly through its official website from Canada for a four-night stay (20th to 23rd November), paying CAD 960. While Google and the hotel’s own materials present it as a five-star property, our experience suggests that it aligns more closely with a three-star establishment, or marginally above that at best. The spa and gym, located down the side of the hotel in a congested, uninviting area, felt far removed from five-star expectations. Compounding this, we experienced two separate power outages, each lasting several minutes. Equally troubling, the Wi-Fi failed on two consecutive afternoons, and it took noticeable time for the staff to restore connectivity—an inconvenience that should not be associated with any hotel claiming premium status. During the same period, two adjacent properties—the Oberoi and the Taj—were available at comparable or only marginally higher rates, yet offered vastly superior facilities and a far more polished environment. This disparity made our choice feel particularly regrettable.
The most disconcerting moment, however, occurred during check-out. When asked whether we had consumed anything from the minibar, we truthfully replied in the negative. Instead of accepting our word—as is standard in reputable international hotels—the receptionist insisted we wait while staff physically verified the room. Having travelled extensively across the globe, we found this behaviour unprofessional, distrustful, and wholly inconsistent with the conduct of a true five-star establishment. It left a distinctly unpleasant final impression.
In conclusion, although there were several positive elements to our stay, the accumulation of negative experiences far outweighed them. With regret, but in the interest of honesty and fairness, we are compelled to assign a rating of only 1 star. The gap between the hotel’s advertised five-star status and the reality we encountered was simply too wide to overlook.