Lawrence G.
Google
I don’t usually review places, but this place left me confused more than impressed. From the start, the menu felt short disjointed, and overpriced, the kind of place where the items have to be exceptional to justify the cost, and unfortunately it just wasn’t. The pricing structure makes even less sense when you see items like a $59 filet sitting on the same menu as a shrimp po’boy, plus a separate Valentine’s menu featuring filet and lobster with no clear value.
Service was also odd. After we finished an appetizer, I placed my used silverware on the plate expecting a fresh set, but our server removed them and set the same utensils directly on the table instead of replacing them. Small detail, but it added to the overall lack of polish.
We kept it simple and ordered teas, one appetizer, and two pasta dishes—and the bill still came to $106. Fine for a great meal, but not for something forgettable. The menu itself feels all over the place: tuna tartare next to a single $20 crab cake, beside beef carpaccio and pork chops. There’s no clear identity or cohesion.
The atmosphere didn’t match the “perfect Valentine’s spot” marketing either. Inside felt more like a bar scene, with people throwing them back, which is fine, but just misses the mark and clashes with the romantic vibe.
Overall, Watervue Grill feels like a restaurant that hasn’t decided what it wants to be—upscale dining, casual bar, or something in between and the prices don’t match the experience.