Todd H.
Google
I would strongly advise against living here.
The apartment had no heat for months during the winter, beginning in early December and not restored until spring. No alternative housing was offered, and there was little to no urgency or meaningful effort to resolve the issue. This alone made the unit uninhabitable.
The building also had a persistent rodent problem, including rats, which was never adequately addressed.
Billing was another major issue. My account was not properly set up until six months after the lease began, followed by random and excessive fees with little explanation. Management frequently cited lease provisions that did not exist or were not included in the actual lease agreement, making disputes difficult to resolve.
Maintenance was consistently inadequate. Washer and dryer units broke repeatedly, and the dryer damaged clothing due to overheating. Maintenance requests were either ignored or improperly handled. At one point, my washer and dryer were replaced with an older, visibly damaged unit.
Management presence was unreliable and unprofessional. Office hours were listed as 9–5, yet staff often left by 2–3 p.m. Communication was poor, and follow-through was rare. Interactions with front office staff—particularly Karolina—were consistently unprofessional and unhelpful.
After the lease ended, my security deposit was not returned in a timely manner. After doing additional research, I learned from the City of Detroit that this property has a history of failed inspections, complaints, and penalties, and that my experience was not isolated.
This property did not meet Detroit’s requirements for habitable housing. If you choose to live here, know your renter’s rights and consider consulting an attorney. The behavior of management reflects the condition of the property itself.