Michael C.
Yelp
Been thinking about visiting this world famous Chateau for many years -- finally did visit yesterday -- October 3, 2024.
Here are my thoughts and a few tips. It's more of an art museum than a gigantic home. You can better appreciate the vast scale of excess house construction in the Louvre, another former aristocratic home. Besides the two beds and a smattering of furnishings -- this building is mostly artworks and some design features. It'd be better to emphasize how the home functioned for the kings and queens and courtiers who lived here 300 years ago. Show us a kitchen -- how was their food prepared and how was it delivered through the vast building spaces? How was the plumbing achieved -- servants and chamber pots or some additional wealth related means? How did they bathe -- was any water delivered directly to their living spaces, and if so, how? the problem I think, began with the sudden decline and end of aristocracy wherein the building was converted into a museum-- it lost its way and its meaning as a symbol of magnificence in home building. The thesis should be returned to that focus. There are plenty of art museums in Paris, there is only one Versailles-- perhaps the opulence of it's residential status for merely 100 or so years in its final form, approximately still present today was wantonly diminished post-1789. To fully appreciate my point, the board should compare it to Hearst Castle, Biltmore, Falling Water, and even Warwick Castle -- for inspiration on what it could be-- instead of just a massive building with a few interesting rooms, lots of art, and a ginormous garden.
Now for the practical part -- Be aware the most comprehensive available to purchase "Passport admission ticket" has several critical limitations:
First, it's not an unlimited pass to the palace for the day -- if you leave the palace proper for the gardens or for lunch-- you cannot get back in...
Second, the gardens can only be entered 2 separate times on your "passport" -- so, if you want to enter the gardens at 8 am before your 9 am Palace entry, that's 1x
Or, if you enter the gardens AFTER visiting the palace, that's 1x, and if you should decide to go to the Italian restaurant just outside the west gate to enjoy lunch, and then re-enter the gardens because you mistakenly think the Trianon is within the gardens, that's 2x. So, after exiting the gardens to see the Trianon, your "Versailles passport" essentially expires.
So, lesson learned the hard way, the Trianon (both petite and grande) are NOT inside the Gardens.
So, If you then use your "passport" to go see the Trianon, you will NOT be able to re-enter the gardens to walk by the palace to get back to the train station-- you'll have to walk around the Versailles' massive property (miles long) to return to your train back to Paris, UNLESS you happen to learn the workaround-- pay 5 euro for the "train" bus to haul you from the Trianon to the castle which does not "stop" at the garden border for a "passport" check. This is an ~1-1/2 mile ride, just an FYI to save you some steps and a garden re-admission fee of 9 euros, if you've already used up your 2 entrances on your "comprehensive passport ticket"
One final thought-- this may be the last remnant of French aristocracy and the place where the armistice was signed after WWI-- but, it's way overcrowded and way underwhelming-- in comparison to other sites in Paris and other famous home tours around the world. This is a one and done kind of place, a deceptive tourist trap, so -- get there at the start of the day and ration your garden entries carefully. Or skip it entirely. The Paris City Museum is actually a more impressive example of an 18th-century aristocratic residence and its free. Gardens abound in France. Art museums are better inside the Paris walls.