R Z
Google
Chicago deserves better than a PR-driven institution sitting on Wall Street-size reserves.
Do your research!
They look impressive,have shiny signs,big marketing,emotional ads.But their financials tell a different story. They operate like a corporation, not a food charity. Over $70 million is sitting in investments and endowments while people go hungry,they have 10 highly paid executives with better retirement plans than most people volunteering or donating, an excessive chunk of donations go to salaries, bonuses,benefits, consultants, and fundraising, NOT FOOD!
Want actual context? Compare them to other major food banks:
Houston Food Bank: 96–97% program spending, extremely low fundraising costs, massive food volume distribution.
LA Regional Food Bank: 97–98% program spending, 110 million pounds of food distributed.
Greater Chicago Food Depository: 92% on paper, but only about $56M is spent on FOOD of the $283M revenue each year. They have extremely low distribution!
The branding is polished. The hunger relief? Not nearly as strong as people assume. If you donate, read their audit first and compare them to better performing food banks. They do a good job of developing a workforce, which is admirable, but they are a food bank, not a workforce development agency, that should be part of their massive marketing budget.