G Q.
Yelp
So, now that I've finished my MFA in Photo/Advanced Certificate in Art Education at Pratt (and no one can rescind my diploma), here are my thoughts.
The graduate photo program was, as of when I finished printing my thesis show in December 2011, not adequately set up to be a graduate photo program. I am not sure how I didn't have an aneurysm during all the technical snafus, denied access, weird red tape, and general frustration just on the "PLEASE JUST LET ME PRINT MY PHOTOGRAPHS" end.
I had some really good, thoughtful, caring, involved, intelligent professors whose classes/help were worth every penny of tuition. Some of those people actually helped me, like, in real life - either to make art, solve a problem, find professional opportunities, or get a job, or something else useful I wouldn't have been able to do without serious mentoring from smart people. SOME OF THOSE PEOPLE EVEN CAME TO MY THESIS EXHIBITION. I also had some really, REALLY bad professors who completely phoned it in, repeatedly missed classes, obviously didn't even read student work, and seemed to grade entirely without the hassle of objectively considering elements like actual work.
The point of getting a piece of expensive paper like an MFA, for me, was to challenge myself to make better work, learn new techniques, gain access to MFA-grade photo facilities, and surround myself with an intelligent community of critical people. That's some lofty shit, and I'd say I got a lot more out of the Art Ed department than the Fine Arts department, both in terms of a community, professor engagement, and the whole "challenging myself" part - because I felt that only a handful of my Fine Arts professors actually seemed interested in student work or nurturing the development of an individual style. Like one of my photo professors, who seemed hell bent on turning every photo grad into a clone of her, and making all the work in that class completely the same.
I was discouraged by the fact that I found critiques here to be less useful (in terms of actual informed criticism) than critiques I experienced as an undergrad. While I assumed that there would be different methods of critique in graduate school, I'd hoped they would be harder, and more centered around historical, technical, and critical knowledge than based on feelings - this is definitely just my opinion, I know there isn't a "wrong" way to discuss art, but it's frustrating to feel like you're having sunshine or storm clouds blown up your ass when you're looking for informed analysis.
I think it's probably worth naming names here, so I want to mention that Pradeep Dalal, Robert Morgan, Michael Brennan, and Allen Frame are totally what I was hoping for in Fine Arts professors. It was so helpful to take their classes because these instructors have a deep knowledge of current and past artists and movements - I discovered some of my new favorite artists through these guys and they helped me refine my own work. I wouldn't have finished my thesis without Donna Moran advocating for the photo grads and actually trying to improve our experience, in spite of her being in a basically impossible situation. I absolutely appreciated the Art Ed professors and I found them all to be helpful, well informed, and engaged. It's pretty great that Pratt allows grad students to study Art Education while in the MFA program, I don't know if I could've gotten an MFA and an advanced certificate in art ed at the same time anywhere else.
I am really, truly grateful for the friends I made at Pratt, and it was awesome to have access to current photo equipment until they kicked all the graduate students out of that facility (while some of us were in the middle of our thesis projects, thanks). I really enjoyed the camaraderie I developed in the studio spaces, until I was forced to move my studio 3 times into increasingly weird spots - it was definitely fascinating to discover that the boiling water pipe in the middle of my studio space actually releases hot, steamy mist in the middle of July, which made for a really interesting working environment. It's nice to learn from adversity... I say that now that I'm not in the middle of that disaster.
Every institution has some bureaucratic issues, to be sure, but Pratt was beyond daunting in this respect during my time as a student. I am ultimately glad I went, but would have likely had a much more positive experience as a photography student somewhere else, where my major wasn't an awkward afterthought that bore the brunt of interdepartmental fighting and funding issues.
I hear the undergrads have a pretty good time. Maybe this is a spot for undergrads and not angry old people like me who walk around grumbling about "in my day," and "back at SAIC..."
Most importantly, there are cats everywhere on the BK campus, and that is really fantastic. The end.