Klaus Kubelka
Google
Can Bosch is furnished extremely stylish. Brickwork, lots of glass, and bright—everything looks very inviting at first glance. Upstairs, you can see into the wine cellar—also very visually appealing.
Unfortunately that evening it was extremely noisy due to (presumably) a birthday party of close to 20 people—the restaurant can't be blamed for that, but there were times when it did affect my enjoyment of the food and the atmosphere.
(This is my subjective opinion of the food. The rating refers to the expectations one might have of a restaurant in this category. +/0/– should be self-explanatory then)
I choose the large tasting menu, which is pleasantly inexpensive at EUR 115.
The appetizers are a Bloody Mary variation (-) and a bite-sized snack on tomato bread with regional tomatoes and eel tartare. (0) Then beef in a parmesan crust and a fish soup with tapioca (-). All of this is very tasty for a good restaurant, but for me, the flavors conveyed are a little unimpressive for a Michelin-starred restaurant
The actual menu begins with Balfegó tuna belly. The dish has a fine texture—balanced between freshness and heartiness. The portion is almost a little too large. Overall, I can already say that even the most ambitious eater will not leave Can Bosch hungry. The presentation is spot on, and the addition of wafer-thin olive crackers is also a good fit. (0)
For me, the absolute highlight of the entire menu was the almond soup that was served next—extremely creative: in addition to the subtle almond flavor, the soup contains three pickles, and depending on which one you choose, you get three different flavor profiles—great (+). The eel is also impressive: perhaps it would be more straightforward with just a trio of eel, foie gras cream, and fig, but the other side dishes are pretty to look at (0)
I always look forward to a langoustine course, as it is one of my favorite ingredients. Unfortunately, the taste is not as good as I had hoped. The vegetables are a little overcooked and the shellfish is relatively bland. Visually, it is also not on the same high level as the first courses (-)
The sea bass with shrimp is attractively presented, but unfortunately, appearance triumphs over texture here. The shrimp is good, but the sea bass was probably cooked at too high a temperature or too long and is tough to chew. The bone foam also does not contribute to a balanced flavor (-)
Unfortunately, the pork meat course is not for me either—it is much too heavy overall and one-dimensional in flavor. A very intense square pulled pork (nice idea) with an eggplant cream—it had no counterpoint and thus remained simply “heavy” (-)
The pre-dessert is superb: fresh and balanced despite the mint (which I don't like) – really delicious, a highlight (0). And for dessert, I think it's a good idea to use pineapple as a base – it provides an interesting contrast to the other flavors (0).
Unfortunately, the desserts don't quite manage to redeem the overall impression. To be honest, I find it difficult to give a final rating. Without taking the price into account, purely as a Michelin-starred restaurant, I would give it 3 stars, for three courses in a row that are not up to the required standard (in terms of taste and texture) lead to this assessment. As a restaurant where only the price plays a role and determines expectations, one could also give it 5 stars. I agree on 4.
On a positive final note, the very attentive service was pleasant, and the brief exchange with the chef was also enjoyable.