Robert G
Google
*Update as expected*
'Regarding safety, we understand how concerning vehicle break-ins can be. While we cannot guarantee the safety of residents or their belongings, we do make every effort to maintain a safe environment.'
(Despite advising the security is not for residents but for their assets in our in person conversation)
....
'I do want to note that this is the first time we are hearing these specific concerns from you directly. We truly value open communication and would welcome the opportunity to work with you to identify potential improvements and solutions moving forward.'
(This is not true since we specifically spoke about break ins including the 10 vehicles broke into one night that was rubbed off because Deborah was not the Property Manager then. Security's consistently sitting in their car on the phone or listening to music loudly unaware of their surroundings. I have AV bringing this up to Deborah, she interrupting to downplay the situation incl. stating that the property nor residents pay for security, and they are not responsible for break ins.)
'If your concerns are addressed, I would appreciate your consideration in updating or removing your review. We genuinely strive to provide a positive living experience for all residents and value fair and accurate feedback.'
(My feedback is accurate. I have video and audio of our conversation to prove it, which I don't need to. I also have witnesses of you brushing off the request to hold footage while a police report was processed and the building was subpoenaed, not caring if the footage is erased over the time the processing would take place. Your lack of respect and concern is such, I had to install a camera in my apartment facing the parking lot due to this. I tried working with you in person under good faith. Yet, you belittled a consistent on time paying resident that has referred people to this property under the different management turning property accountability back to the resident. The only way I will change this review, is if Live At Rangewater or CIM Group replaces you and Anna for a leadership that can act as leaders.)
------------------------------------------
Original Post:
The quality of management in this building has declined significantly under the new administration. The property manager has repeatedly shown a lack of accountability and transparency, often interrupting residents rather than listening to concerns. Legitimate issues—such as break-ins and safety—are routinely deflected or justified instead of being addressed.
The Assistant Manager, Anna, who previously provided incorrect information as a leasing agent and attempted to have leases signed for units that were not ready, now appears to carry that same lack of professionalism into her current role. Basic courtesy and responsiveness are absent, and interactions feel dismissive and unwelcoming.
Rather than focusing on resident safety, maintenance, or improvements, management seems preoccupied with sending frequent, repetitive emails about smoking policies—often accusing non-smoking residents and issuing threats of fines. Meanwhile, critical issues remain unresolved: building security, cleanliness, lighting in parking areas, completion of the clubhouse, hallway carpet maintenance, and basic access control (such as a gate near the Steele Bridge) have all been neglected.
The atmosphere of the building has noticeably changed for the worse. What was once a community now feels dull, tense, and overlooked.
Previous management—Bre and Alex—set a standard of professionalism, accountability, and customer service that this current administration has failed to meet. Their absence is felt daily.
CIM Group, if you are reading this, this property needs a different management company. I am already aware of several residents who have moved or are preparing to leave for the same reasons. If this management remains, I will be doing the same.
I expect the standard response suggesting I reach out for assistance—though past experience suggests that meaningful support will not be provided.