C.
Google
Let me be clear: UC Berkeley is no walk in the park. It’s intense, it’s competitive, and the pressure can feel suffocating — but at least it’s real. The stakes are high, but so is the standard. People here aren’t faking brilliance or politics for clout. They are brilliant — and if they’re tough on you, it’s because the work demands it, not because they’re protecting some fragile academic ego.
Now contrast that with UC Davis, which was hands-down the most fake-deep, bureaucratic, and culturally toxic experience I’ve had in academia. Davis pretends to be collaborative, but underneath the smiling brochures and “friendly” branding is a swamp of gatekeeping, posturing, and performative humility. It’s a place where being independent, curious, or unfiltered makes you a target, not an asset.
At Berkeley, you compete with sharp minds.
At Davis, you survive shallow power games.
At Berkeley, professors are intense but responsive.
At Davis, many professors seem checked out, as if your questions are interruptions rather than part of the learning process.
At Berkeley, you’re expected to rise to the challenge.
At Davis, you’re expected to play nice, flatter the right egos, and not think too loudly.
The irony? UC Davis markets itself as more “down to earth” than Berkeley. But in truth, I found Berkeley to be the more honest and direct institution. The pressure is brutal, yes — but it’s not masked by shallow friendliness. You know what you’re signing up for.
At UC Davis, the rot is hidden under the surface. You don’t see it until you’re neck-deep in a system that rewards performers, not thinkers, and penalizes anyone who doesn’t “fit.”
Berkeley broke me in all the ways high-level academia does — but Davis? Davis insulted my intelligence while pretending to nurture it.
UCB = sharp, brutal, but real.
UCD = soft on the surface, toxic underneath.
If you’re independent, intellectually driven, or allergic to academic theater, UC Davis will wear you down.
At least at Berkeley, the challenge is honest. And worth it….