Rush
Google
Aida Vino e Cucina – Moda, Istanbul
We came to Turkey for a couple of weeks combining business and travel, and as we usually do, we researched restaurants near our hotel in advance. I regularly use the Michelin Guide, and Aida Vino e Cucina is one of only two restaurants in the Moda area mentioned by Michelin. In recent years it appears to have been listed as a Michelin-recommended restaurant, which naturally set certain expectations.
We originally booked a reservation for 5:30 PM. On the day of our dinner, the restaurant called and asked if we could move our reservation later, explaining that staff needed to attend a funeral connected to the restaurant. While this wasn’t ideal and didn’t fit our schedule well, we agreed out of respect.
Because of the delay, we weren’t as hungry as planned by the time we arrived. Our intention was to have a light “trial” meal and return later in the week for a full dinner. My wife and I shared a salad, she ordered an antipasto carpaccio, and I had a small pasta—simple, light dishes.
I also ordered a glass of red wine, and this is where the experience began to unravel. The wine list is center-justified rather than left- or right-aligned, which makes pricing less intuitive at a glance. Under the “wines by the glass” section, two reasonably priced glasses are listed with short names, and their prices line up neatly. Above them, however, is a much longer wine name—significantly more expensive—that visually blends into the section header rather than standing out as a separate, higher-priced option.
While discussing wines with the waitress, I pointed to the wines I believed to be in the roughly €10–€12 range. One was unavailable, and another was suggested after a brief discussion about body and style. Somewhere in that exchange, a clear miscommunication occurred.
When the bill arrived, the total was far higher than expected—even accounting for the service charge. At that point, I realized I had been charged for a wine costing close to €40 per glass, which I neither intended to order nor particularly enjoyed. This was not a deliberate upsell, but it was a preventable misunderstanding that should have been immediately addressed.
I raised the issue on the spot. The response was disappointing. The waitress said there was nothing she could do and framed the conversation around “what we can do better next time.” This was not about a next visit—it was about resolving a mistake in the moment. No manager or owner was proactively involved, no adjustment was offered, and no real attempt was made to find a fair resolution. Only after I explicitly asked did she mention the owner could “call later,” which did nothing to resolve the issue that evening.
We also asked whether the service fee was mandatory. We were told it was not, yet no flexibility or goodwill gesture was offered until we specifically pressed the issue. The overall interaction felt rigid and dismissive.
The service throughout the meal was fine for a normal restaurant, but it did not align with what one expects from a Michelin-recognized establishment. The final interaction, however, was genuinely poor. The lack of accountability, flexibility, and basic service recovery overshadowed the food itself.
This was meant to be a trial visit before returning later in the week. Unfortunately, the trial answered that question for us.
Final note: I anticipate that the owner—who was not present that evening and is likely relying solely on second-hand feedback—may respond by minimizing this situation or framing it as a tourist unhappy with prices. That would be inaccurate. The issue was not cost; it was clarity, communication, and the complete absence of meaningful service recovery when a clear misunderstanding occurred. A Michelin-recognized restaurant should be able to acknowledge that distinction and handle it better than this.
