Dana P.
Yelp
Most of the museum was very well done. However, the exhibit on the Spanish missionaries vs. the Native Americans in California left a lot to be desired.
The exhibit criticized previous descriptions of this period in history as being biased propaganda (i.e., whitewashing the Spaniards' treatment of the Native Americans). Then, the exhibit proceeded to present endless biased propaganda in the opposite direction.
That is not an improvement.
I would have thought that the Autrey Museum would have been better than this.
For example, the exhibit does its level best to show that the Spanish committed genocide against the Native Americans. To support this view, it states that 100,000 Native Americans died in California during this period (about a third of the Native American population). It also states that some natives in the missions were kept in unsanitary conditions.
As I recall, each of the 20 or so missions typically had a garrison of 30-40 Spanish soldiers. Did this small number of soldiers shoot 100,000 Indians? No, of course not.
What did happen? The soldiers coughed...
They carried with them any of the dozens of horrible diseases that had ravaged Europe for thousands of years (e.g., small pox, diphtheria, typhoid, etc.). Many Europeans died, and those who survived had some immunity.
Did the Native Americans have any immunity to these diseases? No. None.
For example, there was one epidemic in Massachusetts in the early 1600s that killed 10% of the European settlers. That's terrible. However, that same epidemic killed 90% of the Native Americans there.
Is that genocide? No, of course not. A plague is a tragedy, but it's not the intentional extermination of a people.
Yet, apparently the Autry Museum is unaware of this.
Similarly, the exhibit states that the Spaniards made slaves of the Native Americans.
So, let me get this straight... A handful of missions, with a few dozen soldiers stationed at each, are going to enslave the Native American population of California (300,000 people)?
Nonsense.
Yes, the Spanish were light years ahead of the Native Americans in technology. The Spanish had ships, they had iron weapons and tools, and they had all manner of industrial ability, while the Native Americans, with their stone tools, didn't have the wheel or written language.
But, the small companies of Spanish soldiers were armed with single-shot flintlock muskets. So, that company of 30 soldiers, after 30 shots, is highly vulnerable. The hundreds of thousands of Native Americans could easily overwhelm them, even with just arrows and clubs.
Just ask Gen. Custer...
So, the idea of a handful of Spaniards imposing their will on the Native Americans by force alone strains credulity.
Yes, the Native Americans worked at the missions. But, there must have been something in it for them, or they wouldn't have done so.
With ten cents worth of organization, they could have easily annihilated the Spaniards. Or, simply walked away...
Were the Native Americans really that incompetent, disorganized or complacent? I highly doubt it. Living the mission life must have been an improvement over what they had before, or they would not have done it.
However, no such open-minded examination of history is in this exhibit. It is strictly a propaganda piece. Its one-sided agenda is all about evil Spanish colonizers, slavery and genocide.
Just because the sin of propaganda has existed in the past does not justify a museum repeating this sin.