Neil Peden
Google
I'm honestly at a loss to understand how this place gets a Michelin guide recommendation.
On the positive side, an Indian-style lamb dish was absolutely phenomenal: as tender as any meat I have eaten, and delicious. The Korean-style spicy fried chicken was also very good; much like any KFC in terms of flavour but very tender.
On the negative side, the fried rice with soft egg, while otherwise delicious, was too salty, the sauce for the paneer tasted like canned tomato soup (I am sure that it wasn't, but it was all I could think about), and the toasted bok choy dish with mayonnaise, tsukemono and gari (sushi ginger) was an absolutely terrible mishmash of flavours. Did the chef even taste this dish??? I can only imagine what a Japanese person would make of it. Incomprehensible.
On the whole, combining Indian, Japanese and Korean dishes is a terrible idea, and is fundamentally unserious. A pan-European restaurant would be bad enough, but these Asians cuisines are far more dissimilar; their flavour profiles are like like chalk and cheese but the diner is expected to compose a tasting menu from them, and there are not enough dishes of any one style. It becomes an exercise in trying to guess which dishes will not taste terrible together. This entire restaurant needs a rethink; pick one cuisine and do it well.
Oh, and the red wine is too warm (I thought that the Michelin guide cared about such things?)