Michael Brandi Andersen
Google
The restaurant is really nice. I would prefer the lighting to be more oriented toward each table to create a more intimate atmosphere. The service was great, and the staff was very friendly.
The downside, in my opinion, is the food. The restaurant should not really have a Michelin star if it were based solely on the food. The dishes are very inventive, but the flavor was often lacking. It feels like no one spent the necessary time to taste, discuss, and optimize the dishes.
There were things I would call mistakes (I’m not a chef). One dish essentially had two sauces on the plate, and they did not complement each other. The sweetbread dish was just that — lots of sweetbread, with no real finesse or complementary flavors.
The best dish was the lobster and caviar. The flavor wasn’t out of this world, but it was clear that there was a lot of technique involved and that someone had worked carefully on the dish.
The next day, we went to another restaurant with no stars at all, and every single dish was better — amazing flavors, good presentation, and well thought through, they should have one star.
---------------------------------------------------------
Thank you for responding: I'm from Denmark and I have traveled in a large number of european countries, and eaten in allot of Michelin restaurants. I think you are kidding yourselves if you try to pretend than your food is amazing in some way. I urge you to bring your relevant people to "Influences" in bourdaux and order their menu. From a flavor perspective this should really change your views. If you really want an experience, book a trip to Copenhagen, and book several 1 star restaurants, I promise you, you will be surprised about what one star means in Copenhagen, vs what it means in France, or at least in you case. It's long been believed by people interrested in food, that it's much easier to get a Michelin star in France than it is in other countries, but that's just an opinion, I don't know that as a fact.