Brett K.
Yelp
If you're not vegetarian and are okay with paying very high prices (at least 25 or so percent of which, in my estimation, actually goes toward the very attractive bayside real estate and its decor and view), go, expect good enough to very good food (small plate menu), a full house, and questionable service that suffers from it and therefore demands your attention. And add a star or two depending upon your priorities.
If you are vegetarian, I'll (re)start by noting that nothing so horrible happened here last night, but we all know that often the most difficult thing about avoiding meat (once one establishes oneself as having done so) is the attitudes of others, and restaurant staff are of course in positions to sway an entire evening in an enjoyable or frustrating direction. In this case, both the menu (and thus the chef and/or owner) and our waitress skewed ours toward the latter, and when paying the aforementioned prices, the resulting disappointment is only intensified.
As there are no(!) vegetarian entrees available (which we knew going in), my only option was to order a selection with the meat removed. Now of course this did not yield a corresponding price reduction so I enjoyed a $29 linguini dish, minus its shrimp. That a standard dinner menu might not offer a vegetarian entree is bad enough; for a sharing menu not to do so is outrageous, and can easily be construed as deliberately hostile. And the too common practice of charging for food not served is flat out exploitation.
Further, I'm not at all required to assume that a member of a wait staff understands the needs of a vegetarian--especially in a venue that is again, so unwelcoming to them (this following, btw, an attempt to patronize another restaurant wherein a group of 5 young employees congregated at the reception desk collectively advised me of my one option of a Caesar salad sans chicken as my entrée--not one of them realizing that a bowl of lettuce and croutons does not constitute an entrée nor that a Caesar salad without chicken added is still not vegetarian...). A waiter or waitress is, however, required to listen to my questions and concerns and respond with a professional and polite manner. Though the exchange was brief and not in any way extreme, needless to say this wasn't my experience.
But this lack of prioritizing the guest was reinforced first after waiting about 45 minutes from the time our dinner was cleared to the arrival of our ice cream and sorbet and again when I asked our waitress (whom I had to have another employee bring to our table by which time the dessert was melting) if I was served the peach version of the latter that I ordered. As it was dark pink and tasted mostly of berry and sugar (and there was a raspberry version available as well), with barely a hint of peach flavor (and of course a sorbet is traditionally flavor intensive), I assumed I was given the wrong one, and it was clear I was not happy with it. But rather than address my dissatisfaction, similar to our earlier interaction, her goal was to simply assure me that I was wrong.
Afterwards the waitress dropped off the check and said thank you for your patience--the first time she acknowledged her neglect (unless you count the expletive she uttered while passing our table and seeing our desserts, long past ordering, were still not served)--which might have meant something had she broken her stride and given us a chance to respond to her words.
Between the attitudes of both the owner or chef who designed the menu and to a lesser extent the employee who put her own and the venue's interests before the guests', this was yet another unfortunate example of how vegetarians' experiences can so often highlight when and how businesses care only about their clientele en masse, and not as individuals.
It's unfortunate for all sorts of reasons.