Chris C.
Google
Epur presents itself with the quiet confidence expected of a Michelin-starred table, yet on this occasion the experience fell short of that promise.
The cuisine was technically correct and thoughtfully composed, but rarely transcendent. Flavors were pleasant and balanced, though they seldom reached the level of surprise or emotional impact one anticipates from a restaurant of this standing. In a menu that should tell a story, several chapters felt safe rather than inspired.
Service, while courteous, showed moments of imprecision. There were minor errors in wine service, including mismatched glasses, which momentarily disrupted the flow of the meal. More concerning was the presence of a small synthetic fiber found in one of the dishes. While clearly not organic in origin, its appearance was unexpected and detracted from the sense of rigor and control that defines fine dining at this level.
Epur remains a good restaurant, with solid fundamentals and clear intent. However, Michelin recognition sets a high bar: consistency, meticulous attention to detail, and a culinary voice capable of leaving a lasting impression. On this visit, the restaurant delivered competence rather than distinction.
There is talent in the kitchen and potential on the plate—but potential, as every inspector knows, is not yet excellence.